Hard passagesDraft · awaiting advisor review
Was Luke wrong about the census under Quirinius?
In short
Luke places Jesus’ birth during a census when Quirinius governed Syria, under Herod the Great. Quirinius is known to have governed Syria and held a census in AD 6, about ten years after Herod’s death. Scholars have proposed solutions, but none is certain; this is a real historical puzzle, in a writer who is accurate on many details that can be checked.
The Objection
Herod the Great died in 4 BC. According to Josephus, Quirinius became governor of Syria and conducted a census in AD 6. Luke has made a mistake of about ten years, so he can’t be trusted as a historian.
Put as its strongest advocates would put it.
The Christian Case
- Scripture
Luke dates Jesus’ birth to the days of Herod and connects it with a census “when Quirinius was governing Syria”.
- Historical evidence
Some scholars translate Luke’s Greek as “this census was before the one when Quirinius governed Syria”; others suggest Quirinius held an earlier office in the region, or that the census was a long process begun under Herod.
- Historical evidence
Luke is accurate on many details that can be checked, such as the title “politarchs” in Thessalonica and Gallio’s time as proconsul of Achaia, and he knew about the AD 6 census himself (Acts 5:37).
- Christians differ
Christians and scholars differ on whether this can be resolved with the evidence we have, and on how much it matters for Luke’s reliability overall.
Where the Evidence Is Weaker
There is no independent record of an empire-wide census at the time of Herod, and every proposed solution has difficulties. It is fair to say this is unresolved.
Arguments to Avoid
- Claiming the problem has been definitively solved.
- Treating one puzzle as proof that Luke is unreliable throughout.
Read for Yourself
Luke 2:1–7
1And it came to pass in those days, that there went out a decree from Cæsar Augustus, that all the world should be taxed. 2(And this taxing was first made when Cyrenius was governor of Syria.) 3And all went to be taxed, every one into his own city. 4And Joseph also went up from Galilee, out of the city of Nazareth, into Judæa, unto the city of David, which is called Bethlehem; (because he was of the house and lineage of David:) 5To be taxed with Mary his espoused wife, being great with child. 6And so it was, that, while they were there, the days were accomplished that she should be delivered. 7And she brought forth her firstborn son, and wrapped him in swaddling clothes, and laid him in a manger; because there was no room for them in the inn.
Related Finds
Politarch inscriptions of Thessalonica
1st – 2nd centuries AD · Found: Thessalonica, Greece (the Vardar Gate inscription, removed 1876)
British Museum, London, and Thessaloniki
Inscriptions naming the city’s magistrates.
What it shows
Luke calls Thessalonica’s officials “politarchs”, a title once thought to be his mistake; inscriptions show it was the city’s own term.
What it doesn’t show
The best-known example is a little later than Paul’s visit; earlier ones also exist.
Gallio Inscription (Delphi)
c. AD 52 · Found: Delphi, Greece, 1905
Delphi Archaeological Museum, Greece
A letter of Emperor Claudius naming Gallio as proconsul of Achaia.
What it shows
Dates Gallio’s term, and so Paul’s trial before him in Corinth, to about AD 51–52: a fixed point for New Testament chronology.
What it doesn’t show
It doesn’t mention Paul.
Further Reading
- The Birth of the Messiah · Raymond E. Brown (1977)
- Hard Sayings of the Bible · Walter C. Kaiser Jr., Peter H. Davids, F. F. Bruce and Manfred T. Brauch (1996)
Drafted with Opened AI and awaiting review by Opened’s apologetics advisors. Labels show the kind of support each point has: Scripture is what the Bible says; historical evidence and philosophical arguments can be checked by anyone; “Christians differ” marks questions on which faithful Christians disagree.
Next QuestionWhy did God send bears on the boys who mocked Elisha?