The Bible’s reliabilityDraft · awaiting advisor review

Hasn’t the Bible been translated too many times to trust?

In short

Modern Bibles are not translations of translations. They are translated directly from the Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek, using the oldest manuscripts available, so each is usually only one step from the original languages. Translation always involves choices, but readers can compare versions and footnotes to see where those choices lie.

The Objection

Meaning is lost whenever words cross languages, and the Bible has crossed many: Hebrew and Greek into Latin, then English and thousands of other tongues. Jesus spoke mainly Aramaic, yet the Gospels are in Greek, so even they are translations. Translators bring their own beliefs, and the many English versions, which often word things differently, suggest no one can be sure what the Bible actually says.

Put as its strongest advocates would put it.

The Christian Case

  1. Historical evidence

    The “Chinese whispers” picture does not match how Bibles are made. Translators work from printed editions of the Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek, based on comparing the manuscripts, and now also consult the Dead Sea Scrolls. Even Tyndale and the 1611 King James translators worked from Hebrew and Greek, not mainly from Latin.

  2. Historical evidence

    Ancient translations, such as the Greek Septuagint (begun in the third century BC) and early Latin, Syriac and Coptic versions, do not weaken our knowledge of the text. Scholars compare them with the Hebrew and Greek manuscripts as extra witnesses to what the originals said.

  3. Philosophical argument

    Every translation involves judgement, but meaning can be carried between languages, or no translated book could be trusted. Many versions differ mainly in style: some keep close to the original wording, others aim for natural English. Having many independent translations makes hidden distortion harder, because anyone can compare them and the originals remain available.

  4. Scripture

    The Bible itself translates. Mark records Jesus’ Aramaic words and gives their meaning in Greek, and at Pentecost people heard the apostles in their own languages. Christians believe God’s word is meant for every nation, so faithful translation is welcomed rather than feared. This is held by faith.

  5. Christians differ

    Christians disagree over which approach is best: word-for-word versions (such as the ESV) or meaning-for-meaning ones (such as the NLT). A minority hold that the King James Version alone should be used in English, and the Orthodox give special weight to the Septuagint. Muslims, for comparison, generally hold that only the Arabic Qur’an is the Qur’an itself; translations convey its meaning.

Where the Evidence Is Weaker

Jesus mostly taught in Aramaic, so the Gospels give his words in Greek translation; Christians trust the apostles’ witness, but it is a real step. Some rare Hebrew words and idioms are uncertain, and translators sometimes make educated guesses. Theology can shape choices on disputed words. Most readers cannot check the originals themselves and must rely on scholars and footnotes.

Arguments to Avoid

  • Saying the Bible has been “translated from translations” hundreds of times; modern versions go back directly to the original languages.
  • Claiming any translation is perfect or free of the translators’ assumptions.
  • Using “the Greek really says…” to overturn standard translations, which usually reflect the scholarly consensus.
  • Treating the Muslim view that the Qur’an is fully itself only in Arabic as a point to score; it is a sincere conviction about revelation.

Read for Yourself

Nehemiah 8:8

So they read in the book in the law of God distinctly, and gave the sense, and caused them to understand the reading.

Acts 2:1–11

1And when the day of Pentecost was fully come, they were all with one accord in one place. 2And suddenly there came a sound from heaven as of a rushing mighty wind, and it filled all the house where they were sitting. 3And there appeared unto them cloven tongues like as of fire, and it sat upon each of them. 4And they were all filled with the Holy Ghost, and began to speak with other tongues, as the Spirit gave them utterance. 5And there were dwelling at Jerusalem Jews, devout men, out of every nation under heaven. 6Now when this was noised abroad, the multitude came together, and were confounded, because that every man heard them speak in his own language. 7And they were all amazed and marvelled, saying one to another, Behold, are not all these which speak Galilæans? 8And how hear we every man in our own tongue, wherein we were born? 9Parthians, and Medes, and Elamites, and the dwellers in Mesopotamia, and in Judæa, and Cappadocia, in Pontus, and Asia, 10Phrygia, and Pamphylia, in Egypt, and in the parts of Libya about Cyrene, and strangers of Rome, Jews and proselytes, 11Cretes and Arabians, we do hear them speak in our tongues the wonderful works of God.

Luke 1:1–4

1Forasmuch as many have taken in hand to set forth in order a declaration of those things which are most surely believed among us, 2Even as they delivered them unto us, which from the beginning were eyewitnesses, and ministers of the word; 3It seemed good to me also, having had perfect understanding of all things from the very first, to write unto thee in order, most excellent Theophilus, 4That thou mightest know the certainty of those things, wherein thou hast been instructed.

Revelation 7:9

After this I beheld, and, lo, a great multitude, which no man could number, of all nations, and kindreds, and people, and tongues, stood before the throne, and before the Lamb, clothed with white robes, and palms in their hands;

Related Finds

Great Isaiah Scroll (Dead Sea Scrolls)
Photo: Unknown artistUnknown artist, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons
Manuscript

Great Isaiah Scroll (Dead Sea Scrolls)

c. 125 BC · Found: Qumran Cave 1, 1947

Shrine of the Book, Israel Museum, Jerusalem

A complete scroll of Isaiah.

What it shows

About a thousand years older than the previous oldest Hebrew manuscripts, yet very close to them: strong evidence that Isaiah was copied with care.

What it doesn’t show

There are many small differences, mostly spelling, and some variant readings.

ManuscriptsEvery place where early copies differ, explained.

Further Reading

  • The Bible in Translation: Ancient and English Versions · Bruce M. Metzger (2001)A clear history of how the Bible has been translated.
  • How to Choose a Translation for All Its Worth · Gordon D. Fee and Mark L. Strauss (2007)
  • Misquoting Jesus · Bart D. Ehrman (2005)A sceptical view, mainly about copying rather than translation.

Drafted with Opened AI and awaiting review by Opened’s apologetics advisors. Labels show the kind of support each point has: Scripture is what the Bible says; historical evidence and philosophical arguments can be checked by anyone; “Christians differ” marks questions on which faithful Christians disagree.

Next QuestionDid Moses write the first five books?

No account is needed to read these pages, and we don’t ask who you are.