Arnobius · The Seven Books of Arnobius Against the Heathen. (Adversus Gentes.)
Book II (part 2 of 4)
Page 408 of 423
21. Now, as we have prepared a place for our idea, let us next receive some one born to dwell there, where there is nothing but an empty void,3542—one of the race of Plato, namely, or Pythagoras, or some one of those who are regarded as of superhuman wit, or have been declared most wise by the oracles of the gods. And when this has been done, he must then be nourished and brought up on suitable food. Let us therefore provide a nurse also, who shall come to him always naked, ever silent, uttering not a word, and shall not open her mouth and lips to speak at all, but after suckling him, and doing what else is necessary, shall leave him fast asleep, and remain day and night before the closed doors; for it is usually necessary that the nurse's care should be near at hand, and that she should watch his varying motions. But when the child begins to need to be supported by more substantial food, let it be borne in by the same nurse, still undressed, and maintaining the same unbroken silence. Let the food, too, which is carried in be always precisely the same, with no difference in the material, and without being re-cooked by means of different flavours; but let it be either pottage of millet, or bread of spelt, or, in imitation of the ancients, chestnuts roasted in the hot ashes, or berries plucked from forest trees. Let him moreover, never learn to drink wine, and let nothing else be used to quench his thirst than pure cold water from the spring, and that if possible raised to his lips in the hollow of his hands. For habit, growing into second nature, will become familiar from custom; nor will his desire extend3543 further, not knowing that there is anything more to be sought after.
22. To what, then, you ask, do these things tend? We have brought them forward in order that—as it has been believed that the souls of men are divine, and therefore immortal, and that they come to their human bodies with all knowledge—we may make trial from this child, whom we have supposed to be brought up in this way, whether this is credible, or has been rashly believed and taken for granted, in consequence of deceitful anticipation. Let us suppose, then, that he grows up, reared in a secluded, lonely spot, spending as many years as you choose, twenty or thirty,—nay, let him be brought into the assemblies of men when he has lived through forty years; and if it is true that he is a part of the divine essence, and3544 lives here sprung from the fountains of life, before he makes acquaintance with anything, or is made familiar with human speech, let him be questioned and answer who he is, or from what father in what regions he was born, how or in what way brought up; with what work or business he has been engaged during the former part of his life. Will he not, then, stand speechless, with less wit and sense than any beast, block, stone? Will he not, when brought into contact with3545 strange and previously unknown things, be above all ignorant of himself? If you ask, will he be able to say what the sun is, the earth, seas, stars, clouds, mist, showers, thunder, snow, hail? Will he be able to know what trees are, herbs, or grasses, a bull, a horse, or ram, a camel, elephant, or kite?3546
23. If you give a grape to him when hungry, a must-cake, an onion, a thistle,3547 a cucumber, a fig, will he know that his hunger can be appeased by all these, or of what kind each should be to be fit for eating?3548 If you made a very great fire, or surrounded him with venomous creatures, will he not go through the midst of flames, vipers, tarantulæ,3549 without knowing that they are dangerous, and ignorant even of fear? But again, if you set before him garments and furniture, both for city and country life, will he indeed be able to distinguish3550 for what each is fitted? to discharge what service they are adapted? Will he declare for what purposes of dress the stragula3551 was made, the coif,3552 zone,3553 fillet, cushion, handkerchief, cloak, veil, napkin, furs,3554 shoe, sandal, boot? What, if you go on to ask what a wheel is, or a sledge,3555 a winnowing-fan, jar, tub, an oil-mill, ploughshare, or sieve, a mill-stone, ploughtail, or light hoe; a carved seat, a needle, a strigil, a laver, an open seat, a ladle, a platter, a candlestick, a goblet, a broom, a cup, a bag; a lyre, pipe, silver, brass, gold,3556 a book, a rod, a roll,3557 and the rest of the equipment by which the life of man is surrounded and maintained? Will he not in such circumstances, as we said, like an ox3558 or an ass, a pig, or any beast more senseless, look3559 at these indeed, observing their various shapes, but3560 not knowing what they all are, and ignorant of the purpose for which they are kept? If he were in any way compelled to utter a sound, would he not with gaping mouth shout something indistinctly, as the dumb usually do?
24. Why, O Plato, do you in the Meno3561 put to a young slave certain questions relating to the doctrines of number, and strive to prove by his answers that what we learn we do not learn, but that we merely call back to memory those things which we knew in former times? Now, if he answers you correctly,—for it would not be becoming that we should refuse credit to what you say,—he is led to do so not by his real knowledge,3562 but by his intelligence; and it results from his having some acquaintance with numbers, through using them every day, that when questioned he follows your meaning, and that the very process of multiplication always prompts him. But if you are really assured that the souls of men are immortal and endowed with knowledge when they fly hither, cease to question that youth whom you see to be ignorant3563 and accustomed to the ways of men;3564 call to you that man of forty years, and ask of him, not anything out of the way or obscure about triangles, about squares, not what a cube is, or a second power,3565 the ratio of nine to eight, or finally, of four to three; but ask him that with which all are acquainted—what twice two are, or twice three. We wish to see, we wish to know, what answer he gives when questioned—whether he solves the desired problem. In such a case will he perceive, although his ears are open, whether you are saying anything, or asking anything, or requiring some answer from him? and will he not stand like a stock, or the Marpesian rock,3566 as the saying is, dumb and speechless, not understanding or knowing even this—whether you are talking with him or with another, conversing with another or with him;3567 whether that is intelligible speech which you utter, or merely a cry having no meaning, but drawn out and protracted to no purpose?
25. What say you, O men, who assign to yourselves too much of an excellence not your own? Is this the learned soul which you describe, immortal, perfect, divine, holding the fourth place under God the Lord of the universe, and under the kindred spirits,3568 and proceeding from the fountains of life?3569 This is that precious being man, endowed3570 with the loftiest powers of reason, who is said to be a microcosm, and to be made and formed after the fashion of the whole universe, superior, as has been seen, to no brute, more senseless than stock or stone; for he is unacquainted with men, and always lives, loiters idly in the still deserts although he were rich,3571 lived years without number, and never escaped from the bonds of the body. But when he goes to school, you say, and is instructed by the teaching of masters, he is made wise, learned, and lays aside the ignorance which till now clung to him. And an ass, and an ox as well, if compelled by constant practice, learn to plough and grind; a horse, to submit to the yoke, and obey the reins in running;3572 a camel, to kneel down when being either loaded or unloaded; a dove, when set free, to fly back to its master's house; a dog, on finding game, to check and repress its barking; a parrot, too, to articulate words; and a crow to utter names.
26. But when I hear the soul spoken of as something extraordinary, as akin and very nigh to God, and as coming hither knowing all about past times, I would have it teach, not learn; and not go back to the rudiments, as the saying is, after being advanced in knowledge, but hold fast the truths it has learned when it enters its earthly body.3573 For unless it were so, how could it be discerned whether the soul recalls to memory or learns for the first time that which it hears; seeing that it is much easier to believe that it learns what it is unacquainted with, than that it has forgot what it knew but a little before, and that its power of recalling former things is lost through the interposition of the body? And what becomes of the doctrine that souls, being bodiless, do not have substance? For that which is not connected with3574 any bodily form is not hampered by the opposition of another, nor can anything be led3575 to destroy that which cannot be touched by what is set against it. For as a proportion established in bodies remains unaffected and secure, though it be lost to sight in a thousand cases; so must souls, if they are not material, as is asserted, retain their knowledge3576 of the past, however thoroughly they may have been enclosed in bodies.3577 Moreover, the same reasoning not only shows that they are not incorporeal, but deprives them of all3578 immortality even, and refers them to the limits within which life is usually closed. For whatever is led by some inducement to change and alter itself, so that it cannot retain its natural state, must of necessity be considered essentially passive. But that which is liable and exposed to suffering, is declared to be corruptible by that very capacity of suffering.
27. So then, if souls lose all their knowledge on being fettered with the body, they must experience something of such a nature that it makes them become blindly forgetful.3579 For they cannot, without becoming subject to anything whatever, either lay aside their knowledge while they maintain their natural state, or without change in themselves pass into a different state. Nay, we rather think that what is one, immortal, simple, in whatever it may be, must always retain its own nature, and that it neither should nor could be subject to anything, if indeed it purposes to endure and abide within the limits of true immortality. For all suffering is a passage for death and destruction, a way leading to the grave, and bringing an end of life which may not be escaped from; and if souls are liable to it, and yield to its influence and assaults, they indeed have life given to them only for present use, not as a secured possession,3580 although some come to other conclusions, and put faith in their own arguments with regard to so important a matter.
28. And yet, that we may not be as ignorant when we leave you as before, let us hear from you3581 how you say that the soul, on being enwrapt in an earthly body, has no recollection of the past; while, after being actually placed in the body itself, and rendered almost senseless by union with it, it holds tenaciously and faithfully the things which many years before, eighty if you choose to say so, or even more, it either did, or suffered, or said, or heard. For if, through being hampered by the body, it does not remember those things which it knew long ago, and before it came into this world,3582 there is more reason that it should forget those things which it has done from time to time since being shut up in the body, than those which it did before entering it,3583 while not yet connected with men. For the same body which3584 deprives of memory the soul which enters it,3585 should cause what is done within itself also to be wholly forgotten; for one cause cannot bring about two results, and these opposed to each other, so as to make some things to be forgotten, and allow others to be remembered by him who did them. But if souls, as you call them, are prevented and hindered by their fleshly members from recalling their former knowledge,3586 how do they remember what has been arranged3587 in these very bodies, and know that they are spirits, and have no bodily substance, being exalted by their condition as immortal beings?3588 how do they know what rank they hold in the universe, in what order they have been set apart from other beings? how they have come to these, the lowest parts of the universe? what properties they acquired, and from what circles,3589 in gliding along towards these regions? How, I say, do they know that they were very learned, and have lost their knowledge by the hindrance which their bodies afford them? For of this very thing also they should have been ignorant, whether their union with the body had brought any stain upon them; for to know what you were, and what to-day you are not, is no sign that you have lost your memory,3590 but a proof and evidence that it is quite sound.3591
29. Now, since it is so, cease, I pray you, cease to rate trifling and unimportant things at immense values. Cease to place man in the upper ranks, since he is of the lowest; and in the highest orders, seeing that his person only is taken account of,3592 that he is needy, poverty-stricken in his house and dwelling,3593 and was never entitled to be declared of illustrious descent. For while, as just men and upholders of righteousness, you should have subdued pride and arrogance, by the evils3594 of which we are all uplifted and puffed up with empty vanity; you not only hold that these evils arise naturally, but—and this is much worse—you have also added causes by which vice should increase, and wickedness remain incorrigible. For what man is there, although of a disposition which ever shuns what is of bad repute and shameful, who, when he hears it said by very wise men that the soul is immortal, and not subject to the decrees of the fates,3595 would not throw himself headlong into all kinds of vice, and fearlessly3596 engage in and set about unlawful things? who would not, in short, gratify his desires in all things demanded by his unbridled lust, strengthened even further by its security and freedom from punishment?3597 For what will hinder him from doing so? The fear of a power above and divine judgment? And how shall he be overcome by any fear or dread who has been persuaded that he is immortal, just as the supreme God Himself, and that no sentence can be pronounced upon him by God, seeing that there is the same immortality in both, and that the one immortal being cannot be troubled by the other, which is only its equal?3598
30. But will he not be terrified by3599 the punishments in Hades, of which we have heard, assuming also, as they do, many forms of torture? And who3600 will be so senseless and ignorant of consequences,3601 as to believe that to imperishable spirits either the darkness of Tartarus, or rivers of fire, or marshes with miry abysses, or wheels sent whirling through the air,3602 can in any wise do harm? For that which is beyond reach, and not subject to the laws of destruction, though it be surrounded by all the flames of the raging streams, be rolled in the mire, overwhelmed by the fall of overhanging rocks and by the overthrow of huge mountains, must remain safe and untouched without suffering any deadly harm.
Moreover, that conviction not only leads on to wickedness, from the very freedom to sin which it suggests, but even takes away the ground of philosophy itself, and asserts that it is vain to undertake its study, because of the difficulty of the work, which leads to no result. For if it is true that souls know no end, and are ever3603 advancing with all generations, what danger is there in giving themselves up to the pleasures of sense—despising and neglecting the virtues by regard to which life is more stinted in its pleasures, and becomes less attractive—and in letting loose their boundless lust to range eagerly and unchecked through3604 all kinds of debauchery? Is it the danger of being worn out by such pleasures, and corrupted by vicious effeminacy? And how can that be corrupted which is immortal, which always exists, and is subject to no suffering? Is it the danger of being polluted by foul and base deeds? And how can that be defiled which has no corporeal substance; or where can corruption seat itself, where there is no place on which the mark of this very corruption should fasten?
But again, if souls draw near to the gates of death,3605 as is laid down in the doctrine of Epicurus, in this case, too, there is no sufficient reason why philosophy should be sought out, even if it is true that by it3606 souls are cleansed and made pure from all uncleanness.3607 For if they all3608 die, and even in the body3609 the feeling characteristic of life perishes, and is lost;3610 it is not only a very great mistake, but shows stupid blindness, to curb innate desires, to restrict your mode of life within narrow limits, not yield to your inclinations, and do what our passions have demanded and urged, since no rewards await you for so great toil when the day of death comes, and you shall be freed from the bonds of the body.
31. A certain neutral character, then, and undecided and doubtful nature of the soul, has made room for philosophy, and found out a reason for its being sought after: while, that is, that fellow3611 is full of dread because of evil deeds of which he is guilty; another conceives great hopes if he shall do no evil, and pass his life in obedience to3612 duty and justice. Thence it is that among learned men, and men endowed with excellent abilities, there is strife as to the nature of the soul, and some say that it is subject to death, and cannot take upon itself the divine substance; while others maintain that it is immortal, and cannot sink under the power of death.3613 But this is brought about by the law ofthe soul's neutral character:3614 because, on the one hand, arguments present themselves to the one party by which it is found that the soul3615 is capable of suffering, and perishable; and, on the other hand, are not wanting to their opponents, by which it is shown that the soul is divine and immortal.
32. Since these things are so, and we have been taught by the greatest teacher that souls are set not far from the gaping3616 jaws of death; that they can, nevertheless, have their lives prolonged by the favour and kindness of the Supreme Ruler if only they try and study to know Him,—for the knowledge of Him is a kind of vital leaven3617 and cement to bind together that which would otherwise fly apart,—let them,3618 then, laying aside their savage and barbarous nature, return to gentler ways, that they may be able to be ready for that which shall be given.3619 What reason is there that we should be considered by you brutish, as it were, and stupid, if we have yielded and given ourselves up to God our deliverer, because of these fears? We often seek out remedies for wounds and the poisoned bites of serpents, and defend ourselves by means of thin plates3620 sold by Psylli3621 or Marsi, and other hucksters3622 and impostors; and that we may not be inconvenienced by cold or intense heat,3623 we provide with anxious and careful diligence coverings in3624 houses and clothing.
33. Seeing that the fear of death, that is, the ruin of our souls, menaces3625 us, in what are we not acting, as we all are wont, from a sense of what will be to our advantage,3626 in that we hold Him fast who assures us that He will be our deliverer from such danger, embrace Him, and entrust our souls to His care,3627 if only that3628 interchange is right? You rest the salvation of your souls on yourselves, and are assured that by your own exertions alone3629 you become gods; but we, on the contrary hold out no hope to ourselves from our own weakness, for we see that our nature has no strength, and is overcome by its own passions in every strife for anything.3630 You think that, as soon as you pass away, freed from the bonds of your fleshly members, you will find wings3631 with which you may rise to heaven and soar to the stars. We shun such presumption. and do not think3632 that it is in our power to reach the abodes3633 above, since we have no certainty as to this even, whether we deserve to receive life and be freed from the law of death. You suppose that without the aid of others3634 you will return to the master's palace as if to your own home, no one hindering you; but we, on the contrary, neither have any expectation that this can be unless by the will of the Lord of all, nor think that so much power and licence are given to any man.
34. Since this is the case, what, pray, is so unfair as that we should be looked on by you as silly in that readiness of belief at which you scoff, while we see that you both have like beliefs, and entertain the same hopes? If we are thought deserving of ridicule because we hold out to ourselves such a hope, the same ridicule awaits you too, who claim for yourselves the hope of immortality. If you hold and follow a rational course, grant to us also a share in it. If Plato in the Phædrus,3635 or another of this band of philosophers, had promised these joys to us—that is, a way to escape death, or were able to provide it and bring us to the end which he had promised,3636 it would have been fitting that we should seek to honour him from whom we look for so great a gift and favour. Now, since Christ has not only promised it, but also shown by His virtues, which were so great, that it can be made good, what strange thing do we do, and on what grounds are we charged with folly, if we bow down and worship His name3637 and majesty from whom we expect to receive both these blessings, that we may at once escape a death of suffering, and be enriched with eternal life?3638
35. But, say my opponents, if souls are mortal and3639 of neutral character, how can they from their neutral properties become immortal? If we should say that we do not know this, and only believe it because said by3640 One mightier than we, when will our readiness of belief seem mistaken if we believe3641 that to the almighty King nothing is hard, nothing difficult, and that3642 what is impossible to us is possible to Him and at His command?3643 For is there anything which may withstand His will, or does it not follow3644 of necessity that what He has willed must be done? Are we to infer from our distinctions what either can or cannot be done; and are we not to consider that our reason is as mortal as we ourselves are, and is of no importance with the Supreme? And yet, O ye who do not believe that the soul is of a neutral character, and that it is held on the line midway between life and death, are not all whatever whom fancy supposes to exist, gods, angels, dæmons, or whatever else is their name, themselves too of a neutral character, and liable to change3645 in the uncertainty of their future?3646 For if we all agree that there is one Father of all, who alone is immortal and unbegotten, and if nothing at all is found before Him which could be named,3647 it follows as a consequence that all these whom the imagination of men believes to be gods, have been either begotten by Him or produced at His bidding. Are they3648 produced and begotten? they are also later in order and time: if later in order and time, they must have an origin, and beginning of birth and life; but that which has an entrance into and beginning of life in its first stages, it of necessity follows, should have an end also.
36. But the gods are said to be immortal. Not by nature, then, but by the good-will and favour of God their Father. In the same way, then, in which the boon3649 of immortality is God's gift to these who were assuredly produced,3650 will He deign to confer eternal life upon souls also, although fell death seems able to cut them off and blot them out of existence in utter annihilation.3651 The divine Plato, many of whose thoughts are worthy of God, and not such as the vulgar hold, in that discussion and treatise entitled the Timæus, says that the gods and the world are corruptible by nature, and in no wise beyond the reach of death, but that their being is ever maintained3652 by the will of God, their King and Prince;3653 for that that even which has been duly clasped and bound together by the surest bands is preserved only by God's goodness; and that by no other than3654 by Him who bound their elements together can they both be dissolved if necessary, and have the command given which preserves their being.3655 If this is the case, then, and it is not fitting to think or believe otherwise, why do you wonder that we speak of the soul as neutral in its character, when Plato says that it is so even with the deities,3656 but that their life is kept up by God's3657 grace, without break or end? For if by chance you knew it not, and because of its novelty it was unknown to you before, now, though late, receive and learn from Him who knows and has made it known, Christ, that souls are not the children of the Supreme Ruler, and did not begin to be self-conscious, and to be spoken of in their own special character after being created by Him;3658 but that some other is their parent, far enough removed from the chief in rank and power, of His court, however, and distinguished by His high and exalted birthright.
37. But if souls were, as is said, the Lord's children, and begotten by3659 the Supreme Power, nothing would have been wanting to make them perfect, as they would have been born with the most perfect excellence: they would all have had one mind, and been of one accord; they would always dwell in the royal palace; and would not, passing by the seats of bliss in which they had learned and kept in mind the noblest teachings, rashly seek these regions of earth, that3660 they might live enclosed in gloomy bodies amid phlegm and blood, among these bags of filth and most disgusting3661 vessels of urine. But, an opponent will say, it was necessary that these parts too should be peopled, and therefore Almighty God sent souls hither to form some colonies, as it were. And of what use are men to the world, and on account of what are they necessary,3662 so that they may not be believed to have been destined to live here and be the tenants of an earthly body for no purpose? They have a share, my opponent says, in perfecting the completeness of this immense mass, and without their addition this whole universe is incomplete and imperfect. What then? If there were not men, would the world cease to discharge its functions? would the stars not go through their changes? would there not be summers and winters? would the blasts of the winds be lulled? and from the clouds gathered and hanging overhead would not the showers come down upon the earth to temper droughts? But now3663 all things must go on in their own courses, and not give up following the arrangement established by nature, even if there should be no name of man heard in the world, and this earth should be still with the silence of an unpeopled desert. How then is it alleged that it was necessary that an inhabitant should be given to these regions, since it is clear that by man comes nothing to aid in perfecting the world, and that all his exertions regard his private convenience always, and never cease to aim at his own advantage?
38. For, to begin with what is important, what advantage is it to the world that the mightiest kings are here? What, that there are tyrants, lords, and other innumerable and very illustrious powers? What, that there are generals of the greatest experience in war, skilled in taking cities; soldiers steady and utterly invincible in battles of cavalry, or in fighting hand to hand on foot? What, that there are orators, grammarians, poets, writers, logicians, musicians, ballet-dancers, mimics, actors, singers, trumpeters, flute and reed players? What, that there are runners, boxers, charioteers, vaulters,3664 walkers on stilts, rope-dancers, jugglers? What, that there are dealers in salt fish, salters, fishmongers, perfumers, goldsmiths, bird-catchers, weavers of winnowing fans and baskets of rushes? What, that there are fullers, workers in wool, embroiderers, cooks, confectioners, dealers in mules, pimps, butchers, harlots? What, that there are other kinds of dealers? What do the other kinds of professors and arts, for the enumeration of which all life would be too short, contribute to the plan and constitution3665 of the world, that we should believe3666 that it could not have been founded without men, and would not attain its completeness without the addition of3667 a wretched and useless being's exertion?3668
39. But perhaps, some one will urge, the Ruler of the world sent hither souls sprung from Himself for this purpose—a very rash thing for a man to say3669—that they which had been divine3670 with Him, not coming into contact with the body and earthly limits,3671 should be buried in the germs of men, spring from the womb, burst into and keep up the silliest wailings, draw the breasts in sucking, besmear and bedaub themselves with their own filth, then be hushed by the swaying3672 of the frightened nurse and by the sound of rattles.3673 Did He send souls hither for this reason, that they which had been but now sincere and of blameless virtue should learn as3674 men to feign, to dissemble, to lie, to cheat,3675 to deceive, to entrap with a flatterer's abjectness; to conceal one thing in the heart,3676 express another in the countenance; to ensnare, to beguile3677 the ignorant with crafty devices, to seek out poisons by means of numberless arts suggested by bad feelings, and to be fashioned3678 with deceitful changeableness to suit circumstances? Was it for this He sent souls, that, living till then in calm and undisturbed tranquillity, they might find in3679 their bodies causes by which to become fierce and savage, cherish hatred and enmity, make war upon each other, subdue and overthrow states; load themselves with, and give themselves up to the yoke of slavery; and finally, be put the one in the other's power, having changed the condition3680 in which they were born? Was it for this He sent souls, that, being made unmindful of the truth, and forgetful of what God was, they should make supplication to images which cannot move; address as superhuman deities pieces of wood, brass, and stones; ask aid of them3681 with the blood of slain animals; make no mention of Himself: nay more, that some of them should doubt their own existence, or deny altogether that anything exists? Was it for this He sent souls, that they which in their own abodes had been of one mind, equals in intellect and knowledge, after that they put on mortal forms, should be divided by differences of opinion; should have different views as to what is just, useful, and right; should contend about the objects of desire and aversion; should define the highest good and greatest evil differently; that, in seeking to know the truth of things, they should be hindered by their obscurity; and, as if bereft of eyesight, should see nothing clearly,3682 and, wandering from the truth,3683 should be led through uncertain bypaths of fancy?
40. Was it for this He sent souls hither, that while the other creatures are fed by what springs up spontaneously, and is produced without being sown, and do not seek for themselves the protection or covering of houses or garments, they should be under the sad necessity3684 of building houses for themselves at very great expense and with never-ending toils, preparing coverings for their limbs, making different kinds of furniture for the wants3685 of daily life, borrowing help for3686 their weakness from the dumb creatures; using violence to the earth that it might not give forth its own herbs, but might send up the fruits required; and when they had put forth all their strength3687 in subduing the earth, should be compelled to lose the hope with which they had laboured3688 through blight, hail, drought; and at last forced by3689 hunger to throw themselves on human bodies; and when set free, to be parted from their human forms by a wasting sickness? Was it for this that they which, while they abode with Him, had never had any longing for property, should have become exceedingly covetous, and with insatiable craving be inflamed to an eager desire of possessing; that they should dig up lofty mountains, and turn the unknown bowels of the earth into materials, and to purposes of a different kind; should force their way to remote nations at the risk of life, and, in exchanging goods always catch at a high price for what they sell, and a low one3690 for what they buy, take interest at greedy and excessive rates, and add to the number of their sleepless nights spent in reckoning up thousands3691 wrung from the life-blood of wretched men; should be ever extending the limits of their possessions, and, though they were to make whole provinces one estate, should weary the forum with suits for one tree, for one furrow; should hate rancorously their friends and brethren?
41. Was it for this He sent souls, that they which shortly before had been gentle and ignorant of what it is to be moved by fierce passions, should build for themselves markets and amphitheatres, places of blood and open wickedness, in the one of which they should see men devoured and torn in pieces by wild beasts, and themselves slay others for no demerit but to please and gratify the spectators,3692 and should spend those very days on which such wicked deeds were done in general enjoyment, and keep holiday with festive gaiety; while in the other, again, they should tear asunder the flesh of wretched animals, some snatch one part, others another, as dogs and vultures do, should grind them with their teeth, and give to their utterly insatiable3693 maw, and that, surrounded by3694 faces so fierce and savage, those should bewail their lot whom the straits of poverty withheld from such repasts;3695 that their life should be3696 happy and prosperous while such barbarous doings defiled their mouths and face? Was it for this He sent souls, that, forgetting their importance and dignity as divine, they should acquire gems, precious stones, pearls, at the expense of their purity; should entwine their necks with these, pierce the tips of their ears, bind3697 their foreheads with fillets, seek for cosmetics3698 to deck their bodies,3699 darken their eyes with henna; nor, though in the forms of men, blush to curl their hair with crisping-pins, to make the skin of the body smooth, to walk with bare knees, and with every other kind of wantonness, both to lay aside the strength of their manhood, and to grow in effeminacy to a woman's habits and luxury?
42. Was it for this He sent souls, that some should infest the highways and roads,3700 others ensnare the unwary, forge3701 false wills, prepare poisoned draughts; that they should break open houses by night, tamper with slaves, steal and drive away, not act uprightly, and betray their trust perfidiously; that they should strike out delicate dainties for the palate; that in cooking fowls they should know how to catch the fat as it drips; that they should make cracknels and sausages,3702 force-meats, tit-bits, Lucanian sausages, with these3703 a sow's udder and iced3704 puddings? Was it for this He sent souls, that beings3705 of a sacred and august race should here practise singing and piping; that they should swell out their cheeks in blowing the flute; that they should take the lead in singing impure songs, and raising the loud din of the castanets,3706 by which another crowd of souls should be led in their wantonness to abandon themselves to clumsy motions, to dance and sing, form rings of dancers, and finally, raising their haunches and hips, float along with a tremulous motion of the loins?
Was it for this He sent souls, that in men they should become impure, in women harlots, players on the triangle3707 and psaltery; that they should prostitute their bodies for hire, should abandon themselves to the lust of all,3708 ready in the brothels, to be met with in the stews,3709 ready to submit to anything, prepared to do violence to their mouth even?3710
43. What say you, O offspring and descendants of the Supreme Deity? Did these souls, then, wise, and sprung from the first causes, become acquainted with such forms of baseness, crime, and bad feeling? and were they ordered to dwell here,3711 and be clothed with the garment of the human body, in order that they might engage in, might practise these evil deeds, and that very frequently? And is there a man with any sense of reason who thinks that the world was established because of them, and not rather that it was set up as a seat and home, in which every kind of wickedness should be committed daily, all evil deeds be done, plots, impostures, frauds, covetousness, robberies, violence, impiety, all that is presumptuous, indecent, base, disgraceful,3712 and all the other evil deeds which men devise over all the earth with guilty purpose, and contrive for each other's ruin?
44. But, you say, they came of their own accord, not sent3713 by their lord. And3714 where was the Almighty Creator, where the authority of His royal and exalted place,3715 to prevent their departure, and not suffer them to fall into dangerous pleasures? For if He knew that by change of place they would become base—and, as the arranger of all things,3716 He must have known—or that anything would reach them from without which would make them forget their greatness and moral dignity,—a thousand times would I beg of Him to pardon my words,—the cause of all is no other than Himself, since He allowed them to have freedom to wander3717 who He foresaw would not abide by their state of innocence; and thus it is brought about that it does not matter whether they came of their own accord, or obeyed His command, since in not preventing what should have been prevented, by His inaction He made the guilt His own, and permitted it before it was done by neglecting to withhold them from action.
45. But let this monstrous and impious fancy be put3718 far from us, that Almighty God, the creator and framer, the author3719 of things great and invisible, should be believed to have begotten souls so fickle, with no seriousness, firmness, and steadiness, prone to vice, inclining to all kinds of sins; and while He knew that they were such and of this character, to have bid3720 them enter into bodies, imprisoned in which,3721 they should live exposed to the storms and tempests of fortune every day, and now do mean things, now submit to lewd treatment; that they might perish by shipwreck, accidents, destructive conflagrations; that poverty might oppress some, beggary, others; that some might be torn in pieces by wild beasts, others perish by the venom of flies;3722 that some might limp in walking, others lose their sight, others be stiff with cramped3723 joints; in fine, that they should be exposed to all the diseases which the wretched and pitiable human race endures with agony caused by3724 different sufferings; then that, forgetting that they have one origin, one father and head, they should shake to their foundations and violate the rights of kinship, should overthrow their cities, lay waste their lands as enemies, enslave the free, do violence to maidens and to other men's wives, hate each other, envy the joys and good fortune of others; and further, all malign, carp at, and tear each other to pieces with fiercely biting teeth.
Notes
- 3542
Lit., "born, and that, too (et wanting in almost all edd.), into the hospice of that place which has nothing, and is inane and empty."
- 3543
So most edd. reading porrigeturfor the ms. corrigetur—"be corrected," i.e., need to be corrected, which is retained in the first ed.
- 3544
So Gelenius, followed by Canterus, Elmenh., and Oberthür, reading portione-m et, while the words tam lætam, "that he is so joyous a part" are inserted before et by Stewechius and the rest, except both Roman edd. which retain the ms. portione jam læta.
- 3545
Lit., "sent to."
- 3546
So the ms., reading milvus, for which all edd. (except Oberthuer) since Stewechius read mulus, "a mule."
- 3547
Carduus, no doubt the esculent thistle, a kind of artichoke.
- 3548
So, according to an emendation in LB., esui, adopted by Orelli and others, instead of the ms. reading et sui.
- 3549
There has been much discussion as to whether the solifuga or solipuga here spoken of is an ant or spider.
- 3550
The ms. reads discriminare, discernere, with the latter word, however, marked as spurious.
- 3551
A kind of rug.
- 3552
Mitra.
- 3553
Strophium, passing round the breast, by some regarded as a kind of corset.
- 3554
Mastruca, a garment made of the skins of the muflone, a Sardinian wild sheep.
- 3555
Tribula, for rubbing out the corn.
- 3556
Aurum is omitted in all edd., except those of LB., Hild., and Oehler.
- 3557
Liber, a roll of parchment or papyrus, as opposed to the preceding codex, a book of pages.
- 3558
The ms. reads vobis unintelligibly, corrected by Meursius bovis.
- 3559
So Orelli and modern edd.; but Crusius gives as the ms. reading conspici-etur (not -et), as given by Ursinus, and commonly received—"Will he not...be seen?"
- 3560
The ms. and first five edd. read et—"and," changed in LB. to sed.
- 3561
In this dialogue (st. p. 81) Socrates brings forward the doctrine of reminiscence as giving a reasonable ground for the pursuit of knowledge, and then proceeds to give a practical illustration of it by leading an uneducated slave to solve a mathematical problem by means of question and answer.
- 3562
Lit., "his knowledge of things."
- 3563
So the ms. and edd., reading i-gnarum rerum, except LB., which by merely omitting the i gives the more natural meaning, "acquainted with the things," etc.
- 3564
Lit., "established in the limits of humanity."
- 3565
i.e., a square numerically or algebraically. The ms., both Roman edd., and Canterus read di-bus aut dynam-us, the former word being defended by Meursius as equivalent to binio, "a doubling,"—a sense, however, in which it does not occur. In the other edd., cubus aut dynamis has been received from the margin of Ursinus.
- 3566
Æneid, vi. 472.
- 3567
This clause is with reason rejected by Meursius as a gloss.
- 3568
Founded on Plato's words (Phædrus, st. p. 247), to d' (i.e., Zeus) hepetai stratia theon te kai daimonon, the doctrine became prevalent that under the supreme God were lesser gods made by Him, beneath whom again were dæmons, while men stood next. To this Orelli supposes that Arnobius here refers.
- 3569
The vessels in which according to Plato (Timæus, st. p. 41), the Supreme Being mixed the vital essence of all being. Cf. c. 52.
- 3570
Lit., "and endowed."
- 3571
The text and meaning are both rather doubtful, and the edd. vary exceedingly. The reading of Orelli, demoretur iners, valeat in ære quamvis, has been translated as most akin to the ms., with which, according to Oehler, it agrees, although Orelli himself gives the ms. reading as ær-io.
- 3572
Lit., "acknowledge turnings in the course."
- 3573
Lit., "but retaining its own things, bind itself in earthly bodies."
- 3574
Lit., "of."
- 3575
So the ms. and edd., reading sua-de-ri, for which Oehler reads very neatly sua de vi—"can anything of its own power destroy," etc.
- 3576
Lit., "not suffer forgetfulness."
- 3577
Lit., "however the most solid unions of bodies may have bound them round."
- 3578
So the edd. reading privat immortalitate has omni, for which, according to Hildebrand, the ms. reads -tatem has omnis—"all these of immortality."
- 3579
Lit., "put on the blindness of oblivion."
- 3580
Cf. Lucretius, iii. 969, where life is thus spoken of.
- 3581
The ms. reads ne videamu-s, changed in both Roman edd. into -amur—"that we may not be seen by you (as ignorant), how say you," etc. Gelenius proposed the reading of the text, audiamus, which has been received by Canterus and Orelli. It is clear from the next words—quemadmodum dicitis—that in this case the verb must be treated as a kind of interjection, "How say you, let us hear." LB. reads, to much the same purpose, scire avemus, "we desire to know."
- 3582
Lit., "before man."
- 3583
Lit., "placed outside."
- 3584
Quod enim.
- 3585
Rebus ingressis.
- 3586
So read by Orelli, artes suas antiquas, omitting atque, which he says, follows in the ms. It is read after suas, however, in the first ed., and those of Gelenius, Canterus, Hildebrand; and according to Oehler, it is so given in the ms., "its own and ancient." Oberthür would supply res—"its own arts and ancient things."
- 3587
So the ms., reading constitut-a, followed by all edd. except those of Ursinus, Hildebrand, and Oehler, who read -æ, "how do they remember when established in the bodies," which is certainly more in accordance with the context.
- 3588
Lit., "of immortality."
- 3589
Cf. ch. 16, p. 440.
- 3590
Lit., "of a lost memory."
- 3591
Lit., "of (a memory) preserved."
- 3592
Capite cum censeatur.
- 3593
Lit., "poor in hearth, and of a poor hut."
- 3594
So the ms., reading malis, for which Ursinus suggested alis, "on the wings of which."
- 3595
i.e., to death.
- 3596
The ms. reads securus, intrepidus—"heedless, fearless;" the former word, however, being marked as a gloss. It is rejected in all edd., except LB.
- 3597
Lit., "by the freedom of impunity."
- 3598
Lit., "the one (immortality)...in respect of the equality of condition of the other"—nec in alterius (immortalitatis) altera (immortalitatas) possit æqualitate conditionis vexari; the reference being clearly to the immediately preceding clause, with which it is so closely connected logically and grammatically. Orelli, however, would supply anima, apo tou koinou, as he puts it, of which nothing need be said. Meursius, with customary boldness, emends nec vi alterius altera, "nor by the power of one can the other," etc.
- 3599
So the ellipse is usually supplied, but it seems simpler and is more natural thus: "But punishments (have been) spoken of" (memoratæ), etc.
- 3600
So ms. and Oehler, for which the edd. read ec quis, "will any one."
- 3601
Lit., "the consequences of things."
- 3602
Lit., "the moving of wheels whirling."
- 3603
Lit., "in the unbroken course of ages"—perpetuitate ævorum.
- 3604
Lit., "and to scatter the unbridled eagerness of boundless lust through," etc.
- 3605
Lucretius (iii. 417 sqq.) teaches at great length that the soul and mind are mortal, on the ground that they consist of atoms smaller than those of vapour, so that, like it, on the breaking of their case, they will be scattered abroad; next, on the ground of the analogy between them and the body in regard to disease, suffering, etc.; of their ignorance of the past, and want of developed qualities; and finally, on the ground of the adaptation of the soul to the body, as of a fish to the sea, so that life under other conditions would be impossible.
- 3606
The ms. and first four edd. read has, "that these souls," etc.; in the other edd., hac is received as above from the margin of Ursinus.
- 3607
Cf. Plato, Phædo (st. p. 64 sq.), where death is spoken of as only a carrying further of that separation of the soul from the pleasures and imperfections of the body which the philosopher strives to effect in this life.
- 3608
Lit., "in common."
- 3609
Pl.
- 3610
This refers to the second argument of Lucretius noticed above.
- 3611
i.e., the abandoned and dissolute immortal spoken of in last chapter.
- 3612
Lit., "with."
- 3613
Lit., "degenerate into mortal nature."
- 3614
Arnobius seems in this chapter to refer to the doctrine of the Stoics, that the soul must be material, because, unless body and soul were of one substance, there could be no common feeling or mutual affection (so Cleanthes in Nemes. de Nat. Hom., ii. p. 33); and to that held by some of them, that only the souls of the wise remained after death, and these only till the conflagration (Stob., Ecl. Phys., p. 372) which awaits the world, and ends the Stoic great year or cycle. Others, however, held that the souls of the wise became dæmons and demigods (Diog., Lært., vii. 157 and 151).
- 3615
Lit., "they"—eas.
- 3616
Lit., "from the gapings and," etc.
- 3617
There may be here some echo of the words (), "This is eternal life, that they may know Thee, the only true God," etc.; but there is certainly not sufficient similarity to found a direct reference on, as has been done by Orelli and others.
- 3618
i.e., souls.
- 3619
This passage presents no difficulty in itself, its sense being obviously that, as by God's grace life is given to those who serve Him, we must strive to fit ourselves to receive His blessing. The last words, however, have seemed to some fraught with mystery, and have been explained by Heraldus at some length as a veiled or confused reference to the Lord's Supper, as following upon baptism and baptismal regeneration, which, he supposes, are referred to in the preceding words, "laying aside," etc. [It is not, however, the language of a mere catechumen.]
- 3620
These "thin plates," laminæ, Orelli has suggested, were amulets worn as a charm against serpents.
- 3621
ms. Phyllis.
- 3622
So the edd., reading instit-oribusfor the ms. instit-ut-oribus, "makers."
- 3623
Lit., "that colds and violent suns may not," etc.
- 3624
Lit., "of."
- 3625
Lit., "is set before."
- 3626
So the ms., first ed., Gelenius, Canterus, Hildebrand, reading ex commodi sensu, for which all the other edd., following Ursinus and Meursius, read ex communi—"from common sense," i.e., wisely.
- 3627
Perhaps, as Orelli evidently understands it, "prefer Him to our own souls"—animis præponimus.
- 3628
So Oehler, reading ea for the ms. ut, omitted in all edd.
- 3629
Lit., "by your own and internal exertion."
- 3630
Lit., "of things."
- 3631
Lit., "wings will be at hand."
- 3632
The ms. reads di-cimus, "say;" corrected du, as above.
- 3633
The first four edd. read res, "things above," for which Stewechius reads, as above, sedes.
- 3634
Sponte.
- 3635
Here, as in c. 7, p. 436, n. 3, the edd. read Phædone, with the exception of the first ed., LB., Hildebrand, and Oehler, who follow the ms. as above.
- 3636
Lit., "to the end of promising."
- 3637
Meursius suggests numini, "deity," on which it may be well to remark once for all, that nomen and numen are in innumerable places interchanged in one or other of the edd. The change, however, is usually of so little moment, that no further notice will be taken of it.
- 3638
So the ms., according to Rigaltius and Hildebrand, reading vitæ æternitate, while Crusius asserts that the ms. gives vita et—"with life and eternity."
- 3639
The ms. reading is, mortalis est qualitatis. The first five edd. merely drop est—"of mortal, of neutral," etc.; LB. and the others read, es et, as above.
- 3640
Lit., "heard from."
- 3641
So the ms., according to Crusius, the edd. reading cred-id-imus—"have believed."
- 3642
Lit., "if we believe that."
- 3643
So the ms., reading ad modum obsecutionis paratum—"prepared to the mode of compliance;" for which the edd. read adm. executioni—"quite prepared for performing," except Hildebrand, who gives adm. obsecutioni—"for obedience."
- 3644
So the ms., according to Crusius, but all edd. read sequ-a-tur (for i)—"Is there anything which He has willed which it does not follow," etc.
- 3645
So all edd., reading mutabiles, except the two Roman edd. and Oehler, who gives, as the reading of the ms., nu.—"tottering."
- 3646
Lit., "in the doubtful condition of their lot."
- 3647
Lit., "which may have been of a name."
- 3648
LB., followed by the later edd., inserted si, "if they are," which is certainly more consistent with the rest of the sentence.
- 3649
The ms. reading is utterly corrupt and meaningless—immortalitatis largiter est donum dei certa prolatis. Gelenius, followed by Canterus, Oberthür, and Orelli, emended largi-tio...certe, as above. The two Roman edd. read, -tatem largitus...certam—"bestowed, assured immortality as God's gift on," etc.
- 3650
i.e., who must therefore have received it if they have it at all.
- 3651
Lit., "out, reduced to nothing with annihilation, not to be returned from."
- 3652
Lit., "they are held in a lasting bond," i.e., of being.
- 3653
Plato makes the supreme God, creator of the inferior deities, assure these lesser gods that their created nature being in itself subject to dissolution, His will is a surer ground on which to rely for immortality, than the substance or mode of their own being (Timæus, st. p. 41; translated by Cicero, de Univ., xi., and criticised de Nat. Deor., i. 8 and iii. 12).
- 3654
The ms. and both Roman edd. read neque ullo ab-olitio-nis unintelligibly, for which Gelenius proposed nexusque abolitione—"and by the destruction of the bond;" but the much more suitable reading in the margin of Ursinus, translated above, ullo ab alio nis-i, has been adopted by later edd.
- 3655
Lit., "be gifted with a saving order." So the ms., reading salutari iussione, followed by both Rom. edd.; LB. and Orelli read vinctione—"bond;" Gelenius, Canterus, Elmenh., and Oberthür, m-issione—"dismissal."
- 3656
Lit., "that to the gods themselves the natures are intermediate."
- 3657
Lit., "supreme"—principali.
- 3658
Cf. i. 48. On this passage Orelli quotes Irenæus, i. 21, where are enumerated several gnostic theories of the creation of the world and men by angels, who are themselves created by the "one unknown Father." Arnobius is thought, both by Orelli and others, to share in these opinions, and in this discussion to hint at them, but obscurely, lest his cosmology should be confounded by the Gentiles with their own polytheistic system. It seems much more natural to suppose that we have here the indefinite statement of opinions not thoroughly digested.
- 3659
Lit., "a generation of."
- 3660
Canterus, Elmenhorst, Oberthür, and Orelli omit ut, which is retained as above by the rest.
- 3661
Lit., "obscene."
- 3662
Elmenhorst endeavours to show that Arnobius coincides in this argument with the Epicureans, by quoting Lucr. v. 165 sqq. and Lact. vii. 5, where the Epicurean argument is brought forward, What profit has God in man, that He should have created him? In doing this, it seems not to have been observed that the question asked by Arnobius is a very different one: What place has man in the world, that God should be supposed to have sent him to fill it?
- 3663
i.e., so far from this being the case.
- 3664
i.e., from one horse to another—desultores.
- 3665
Rationibus et constitutionibus.
- 3666
Lit., "it should be believed."
- 3667
Lit., "unless there were joined."
- 3668
So the ms., reading contentio, which Orelli would understand as meaning "contents," which may be correct. LB. reads conditio—"condition," ineptly; and Ursinus in the margin, completio—"the filling up."
- 3669
So the later edd., from the margin of Ursinus, reading quod temeritatis est maximæ for the ms. quem—"whom it shows the greatest rashness to speak of."
- 3670
Lit., "goddesses."
- 3671
So Gelenius (acc. to Orelli), reading as in the margin of Ursinus, terrenæ circumscriptionis, for the unintelligible reading of the ms., temerariæ, retained in both Roman edd., Canterus, and (acc. to Oehler) Gelenius. LB. reads metariæ—"a limiting by boundaries."
- 3672
Lit., "motions."
- 3673
Cf. Lucr., v. 229 sq. The same idea comes up again in iv. 21.
- 3674
Lit., "in."
- 3675
According to Hildebrand, the ms. reads dissimular-ent circumscribere, so that, by merely dropping nt, he reads, "to dissemble and cheat;" but according to Crusius, iri is found in the ms. between these two words, so that by prefixing m Sabæus in the first ed. read m-ent-iri as above, followed by all other edd.
- 3676
Lit., "to roll...in the mind."
- 3677
Rigaltius and Hildebrand regard decipere as a gloss.
- 3678
So the ms., reading formari, followed by Hildebrand and Oehler; but all the other edd. give the active form, -are.
- 3679
Lit., "from."
- 3680
The condition, i.e., of freedom.
- 3681
LB., seemingly received by Orelli, though not inserted into his text, reads poscerent eos for the ms. -entur, which Hildebrand modifies -ent ea as above.
- 3682
Lit., "certain."
- 3683
Lit., "by error."
- 3684
Lit., "the sad necessity should be laid upon them, that," etc.
- 3685
Lit., "for the want of daily things," diurnorun egestati, for which Stewechius would read diurna egestate—"from daily necessity."
- 3686
Lit., "of."
- 3687
Lit., "poured forth all their blood."
- 3688
Lit., "of their labour."
- 3689
Lit., "at last by force of."
- 3690
So the ms. and edd., reading vilitatem, for which Meursius proposed very needlessly utilitatem—"and at an advantage."
- 3691
So, adhering very closely to the ms., which gives e-t sanguine supputandis augere-t insomnia milibus, the t of e-t being omitted and n inserted by all. The first five edd. read, -tandi se angerent insania: millibus—"harass themselves with the madness of reckoning; by miles should extend," etc.,—the only change in Heraldus and Orelli being a return to insomnia—"harass with sleeplessness," etc.
- 3692
So restored by Cujacius, followed by LB. and Orelli, reading in grat-i-am (ms. wants i) voluptatemque, while the first five edd. merely drop -que—"to the grateful pleasure," etc.
- 3693
Lit., "most cruel."
- 3694
Lit., "among," in oris, the ms. reading, and that of the first four edd., for which the others have received from the margin of Ursinus moribus—"(indulging) in so fierce and savage customs."
- 3695
Lit., "tables."
- 3696
Lit., "they should live."
- 3697
Lit., "lessen."
- 3698
In the ms. this clause follows the words "loss of their purity," where it is very much in the way. Orelli has followed Heraldus in disposing of it as above, while LB. inserts it after "tips of their ears." The rest adhere to the arrangement of the ms., Ursinus suggesting instead of his—"with these," catenis—"with chains;" Heraldus, linis—"with strings (of pearls);" Stewechius, tæniis—"with fillets."
- 3699
So LB. and Orelli reading, con-fic-iendis corporibus for the ms. con-sp-iendis, for which the others read -spic-, "to win attention." A conjecture by Oudendorp, brought forward by Orelli, is worthy of notice—con-spu-endis, "to cover," i.e., so as to hide defects.
- 3700
Lit., "passages of ways."
- 3701
Lit., "substitute."
- 3702
So the later edd., reading botulos; the ms. and early edd. give boletos—"mushrooms."
- 3703
For his, Heinsius proposes hiris—"with the intestines."
- 3704
Lit., "in a frozen condition." As to the meaning of this there is difference of opinion: some supposing that it means, as above, preserved by means of ice, or at least frozen; while others interpret figuratively, "as hard as ice." [Our Scottish translators have used their local word, "iced haggises:" I have put puddings instead, which gives us, at least, an idea of something edible. To an American, what is iced conveys the idea of a drink. The budinarius, heretofore noted, probably made these iced saucisses.]
- 3705
Lit., "things"—res.
- 3706
Scabilla were a kind of rattles or castanets moved by the feet.
- 3707
Sambuca, not corresponding to the modern triangle, but a stringed instrument of that shape. Its notes were shrill and disagreeable, and those who played on it of indifferent character.
- 3708
So the ms. and first four edd., reading virilitatem sui populo publicarent. Meursius emended utilitatem—"made common the use," etc.; and Orelli, from the margin of Ursinus, vilitatem—"their vileness."
- 3709
The ms. reads in fornicibus obvi-t-ae, which, dropping t, is the reading translated, and was received by Elmenhorst, LB., and Hildebrand, from the margin of Ursinus. The other edd. insert nc before t—"bound."
- 3710
The translation does not attempt to bring out the force of the words ad oris stuprum paratæ, which are read by Orelli after Ursinus and Gelenius. The text is so corrupt, and the subject so obscene, that a bare reference to the practice may be sufficient.
- 3711
The ms. reads, habitare atque habitare juss-e-r-unt. All edd. omit the first two words, the first ed. without further change; but the active verb is clearly out of place, and therefore all other edd. read jussæ sunt, as above. Oehler, however, from habitare omitted by the others, would emend aditare, "to approach,"—a conjecture with very little to recommend it.
- 3712
These are all substantives in the original.
- 3713
So the ms., reading non missione—"not by the sending;" but, unaccountably enough, all edd. except Hildebrand and Oehler read, jussione—"not by the command."
- 3714
So the ms..
- 3715
Lit., "royal sublimity."
- 3716
Lit., "causes."
- 3717
The ms. and both Roman edd. read abscondere—"to hide," for which the other edd. read, as above, abscedere, from the margin of Ursinus.
- 3718
Lit., "go."
- 3719
By Hildebrand and Oehler, procreator is with reason regarded as a gloss.
- 3720
The ms., both Roman edd., and Hildebrand read jussisset; but this would throw the sentence into confusion, and the other edd. therefore drop t.
- 3721
LB., Hildebrand, and Oehler read quorum indu-c-tæ carceribus—"led into the prisons of which," all other edd. omitting c as above. According to Oehler, the ms. has the former reading.
- 3722
The ms. and both Roman edd. read in-f-ernarum paterentut aliæ laniatus muscularum, which has no meaning, and is little improved by Galenius changing ut into ur, as no one knows what "infernal flies" are. LB. and Orelli, adopting a reading in the margin of Ursinus, change intern. into ferarum, and join musc. with the words which follow as above. Another reading, also suggested by Ursinus, seems preferable, however, internorum...musculorum—"suffer rendings (i.e., spasms) of the inner muscles."
- 3723
Lit., "bound."
- 3724
Lit., "dilaceration of."
Ante-Nicene Fathers, Volume 6, ed. Alexander Roberts, James Donaldson and A. Cleveland Coxe (1885–96). Public domain. Text from the Christian Classics Ethereal Library.