Against Hermogenes · On the Flesh of Christ · Chapter XXIII
Simeon's "Sign that Should Be Contradicted," Applied to the Heretical Gainsaying of the True Birth of Christ. One of the Heretics' Paradoxes Turned in Support of Catholic Truth
Page 463 of 661
We acknowledge, however, that the prophetic declaration of Simeon is fulfilled, which he spoke over the recently-born Saviour:7250 "Behold, this child is set for the fall and rising again of many in Israel, and for a sign that shall be spoken against."7251 The sign (here meant) is that of the birth of Christ, according to Isaiah: "Therefore the Lord Himself shall give you a sign: behold, a virgin shall conceive and bear a son."7252 We discover, then, what the sign is which is to be spoken against—the conception and the parturition of the Virgin Mary, concerning which these sophists7253 say: "She a virgin and yet not a virgin bare, and yet did not bear;" just as if such language, if indeed it must be uttered, would not be more suitable even for ourselves to use! For "she bare," because she produced offspring of her own flesh and "yet she did not bear," since she produced Him not from a husband's seed; she was "a virgin," so far as (abstinence) from a husband went, and "yet not a virgin," as regards her bearing a child. There is not, however, that parity of reasoning which the heretics affect: in other words it does not follow that for the reason "she did not bear,"7254 she who was "not a virgin" was "yet a virgin," even because she became a mother without any fruit of her own womb. But with us there is no equivocation, nothing twisted into a double sense.7255 Light is light; and darkness, darkness; yea is yea; and nay, nay; "whatsoever is more than these cometh of evil."7256 She who bare (really) bare; and although she was a virgin when she conceived, she was a wife7257 when she brought forth her son. Now, as a wife, she was under the very law of "opening the womb,"7258 wherein it was quite immaterial whether the birth of the male was by virtue of a husband's co-operation or not;7259 it was the same sex7260 that opened her womb. Indeed, hers is the womb on account of which it is written of others also: "Every male that openeth the womb shall be called holy to the Lord."7261 For who is really holy but the Son of God? Who properly opened the womb but He who opened a closed one?7262 But it is marriage which opens the womb in all cases. The virgin's womb, therefore, was especially7263 opened, because it was especially closed. Indeed7264 she ought rather to be called not a virgin than a virgin, becoming a mother at a leap, as it were, before she was a wife. And what must be said more on this point? Since it was in this sense that the apostle declared that the Son of God was born not of a virgin, but "of a woman," he in that statement recognised the condition of the "opened womb" which ensues in marriage.7265 We read in Ezekiel of "a heifer7266 which brought forth, and still did not bring forth." Now, see whether it was not in view of your own future contentions about the womb of Mary, that even then the Holy Ghost set His mark upon you in this passage; otherwise7267 He would not, contrary to His usual simplicity of style (in this prophet), have uttered a sentence of such doubtful import, especially when Isaiah says, "She shall conceive and bear a son."7268
Chapter XXIV.—Divine Strictures on Various Heretics Descried in Various Passages of Prophetical Scripture. Those Who Assail the True Doctrine of the One Lord Jesus Christ, Both God and Man, Thus Condemned.
For when Isaiah hurls denunciation against our very heretics, especially in his "Woe to them that call evil good, and put darkness for light,"7269 he of course sets his mark upon those amongst you7270 who preserve not in the words they employ the light of their true significance, (by taking care) that the soul should mean only that which is so called, and the flesh simply that which is confest to our view, and God none other than the One who is preached.7271 Having thus Marcion in his prophetic view, he says, "I am God, and there is none else; there is no God beside me."7272 And when in another passage he says, in like manner, "Before me there was no God,"7273 he strikes at those inexplicable genealogies of the Valentinian Æons. Again, there is an answer to Ebion in the Scripture: "Born,7274 not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God." In like manner, in the passage, "If even an angel of heaven preach unto you any other gospel than that which we have preached unto you, let him be anathema,"7275 he calls attention to the artful influence of Philumene,7276 the virgin friend of Apelles. Surely he is antichrist who denies that Christ has come in the flesh.7277 By declaring that His flesh is simply and absolutely true, and taken in the plain sense of its own nature, the Scripture aims a blow at all who make distinctions in it.7278 In the same way, also, when it defines the very Christ to be but one, it shakes the fancies of those who exhibit a multiform Christ, who make Christ to be one being and Jesus another,—representing one as escaping out of the midst of the crowds, and the other as detained by them; one as appearing on a solitary mountain to three companions, clothed with glory in a cloud, the other as an ordinary man holding intercourse with all,7279 one as magnanimous, but the other as timid; lastly, one as suffering death, the other as risen again, by means of which event they maintain a resurrection of their own also, only in another flesh. Happily, however, He who suffered "will come again from heaven,"7280 and by all shall He be seen, who rose again from the dead. They too who crucified Him shall see and acknowledge Him; that is to say, His very flesh, against which they spent their fury, and without which it would be impossible for Himself either to exist or to be seen; so that they must blush with shame who affirm that His flesh sits in heaven void of sensation, like a sheath only, Christ being withdrawn from it; as well as those who (maintain) that His flesh and soul are just the same thing,7281 or else that His soul is all that exists,7282 but that His flesh no longer lives.
Notes
- 7250
Literally, "Lord."
- 7251
.
- 7252
.
- 7253
Academici isti: "this school of theirs."
- 7254
i.e. "Because she produced not her son from her husband's seed."
- 7255
Defensionem.
- 7256
.
- 7257
Nupsit.
- 7258
Nupsit ipsa patefacti corporis lege.
- 7259
De vi masculi admissi an emissi.
- 7260
i.e. "The male."
- 7261
; .
- 7262
Clausam: i.e. a virgin's.
- 7263
Magis.
- 7264
Utique.
- 7265
Nuptialem passionem.
- 7266
Epiphanius (Hær. xxx. 30) quotes from the apocryphal Ezekiel this passage: Texetai he damalis, kai erousin—ou tetoken. So Clem. Alex. Stromata, vii. Oehler.
- 7267
Ceterum.
- 7268
.
- 7269
.
- 7270
Istos.
- 7271
Prædicatur.
- 7272
.
- 7273
.
- 7274
. Tertullian's quotation is, as usual, in the singular, "natus."
- 7275
.
- 7276
Comp. de Præscr. Hæret. c. xxx. p. 257, supra.
- 7277
.
- 7278
Disceptatores ejus.
- 7279
Ceteris passivum.
- 7280
.
- 7281
Tantundem.
- 7282
Tantummodo.