Tertullian · I. The Prescription Against Heretics · Chapter XXXVIII
Harmony of the Church and the Scriptures. Heretics Have Tampered with the Scriptures, and Mutilated, and Altered Them. Catholics Never Change the Scriptures, Which Always Testify for Them
Page 279 of 661
Where diversity of doctrine is found, there, then, must the corruption both of the Scriptures and the expositions thereof be regarded as existing. On those whose purpose it was to teach differently, lay the necessity of differently arranging the instruments of doctrine.2250 They could not possibly have effected their diversity of teaching in any other way than by having a difference in the means whereby they taught. As in their case, corruption in doctrine could not possibly have succeeded without a corruption also of its instruments, so to ourselves also integrity of doctrine could not have accrued, without integrity in those means by which doctrine is managed. Now, what is there in our Scriptures which is contrary to us?2251 What of our own have we introduced, that we should have to take it away again, or else add to it, or alter it, in order to restore to its natural soundness anything which is contrary to it, and contained in the Scriptures?2252 What we are ourselves, that also the Scriptures are (and have been) from the beginning.2253 Of them we have our being, before there was any other way, before they were interpolated by you. Now, inasmuch as all interpolation must be believed to be a later process, for the express reason that it proceeds from rivalry which is never in any case previous to nor home-born2254 with that which it emulates, it is as incredible to every man of sense that we should seem to have introduced any corrupt text into the Scriptures, existing, as we have been, from the very first, and being the first, as it is that they have not in fact introduced it who are both later in date and opposed (to the Scriptures). One man perverts the Scriptures with his hand, another their meaning by his exposition. For although Valentinus seems to use the entire volume,2255 he has none the less laid violent hands on the truth only with a more cunning mind and skill2256 than Marcion. Marcion expressly and openly used the knife, not the pen, since he made such an excision of the Scriptures as suited his own subject-matter.2257 Valentinus, however, abstained from such excision, because he did not invent Scriptures to square with his own subject-matter, but adapted his matter to the Scriptures; and yet he took away more, and added more, by removing the proper meaning of every particular word, and adding fantastic arrangements of things which have no real existence.2258
Chapter XXXIX.—What St. Paul Calls Spiritual Wickednesses Displayed by Pagan Authors, and by Heretics, in No Dissimilar Manner. Holy Scripture Especially Liable to Heretical Manipulation. Affords Material for Heresies, Just as Virgil Has Been the Groundwork of Literary Plagiarisms, Different in Purport from the Original.
These were the ingenious arts of "spiritual wickednesses,"2259 wherewith we also, my brethren, may fairly expect to have "to wrestle," as necessary for faith, that the elect may be made manifest, (and) that the reprobate may be discovered. And therefore they possess influence, and a facility in thinking out and fabricating2260 errors, which ought not to be wondered at as if it were a difficult and inexplicable process, seeing that in profane writings also an example comes ready to hand of a similar facility. You see in our own day, composed out of Virgil,2261 a story of a wholly different character, the subject-matter being arranged according to the verse, and the verse according to the subject-matter. In short,2262 Hosidius Geta has most completely pilfered his tragedy of Medea from Virgil. A near relative of my own, among some leisure productions2263 of his pen, has composed out of the same poet The Table of Cebes. On the same principle, those poetasters are commonly called Homerocentones, "collectors of Homeric odds and ends," who stitch into one piece, patchwork fashion, works of their own from the lines of Homer, out of many scraps put together from this passage and from that (in miscellaneous confusion). Now, unquestionably, the Divine Scriptures are more fruitful in resources of all kinds for this sort of facility. Nor do I risk contradiction in saying2264 that the very Scriptures were even arranged by the will of God in such a manner as to furnish materials for heretics, inasmuch as I read that "there must be heresies,"2265 which there cannot be without the Scriptures.
Chapter XL.—No Difference in the Spirit of Idolatry and of Heresy. In the Rites of Idolatry, Satan Imitated and Distorted the Divine Institutions of the Older Scriptures. The Christian Scriptures Corrupted by Him in the Perversions of the Various Heretics.
The question will arise, By whom is to be interpreted2266 the sense of the passages which make for heresies? By the devil, of course, to whom pertain those wiles which pervert the truth, and who, by the mystic rites of his idols, vies even with the essential portions2267 of the sacraments of God.2268 He, too, baptizes some—that is, his own believers and faithful followers;2269 he promises the putting away2270 of sins by a laver (of his own); and if my memory still serves me, Mithra there, (in the kingdom of Satan,) sets his marks on the foreheads of his soldiers; celebrates also the oblation of bread, and introduces an image of a resurrection, and before a sword wreathes a crown.2271 What also must we say to (Satan's) limiting his chief priest2272 to a single marriage? He, too, has his virgins; he, too, has his proficients in continence.2273 Suppose now we revolve in our minds the superstitions of Numa Pompilius, and consider his priestly offices and badges and privileges, his sacrificial services, too, and the instruments and vessels of the sacrifices themselves, and the curious rites of his expiations and vows: is it not clear to us that the devil imitated the well-known2274 moroseness of the Jewish law? Since, therefore he has shown such emulation in his great aim of expressing, in the concerns of his idolatry, those very things of which consists the administration of Christ's sacraments, it follows, of course, that the same being, possessing still the same genius, both set his heart upon,2275 and succeeded in, adapting2276 to his profane and rival creed the very documents of divine things and of the Christian saints2277—his interpretation from their interpretations, his words from their words, his parables from their parables. For this reason, then, no one ought to doubt, either that "spiritual wickednesses," from which also heresies come, have been introduced by the devil, or that there is any real difference between heresies and idolatry, seeing that they appertain both to the same author and the same work that idolatry does. They either pretend that there is another god in opposition to the Creator, or, even if they acknowledge that the Creator is the one only God, they treat of Him as a different being from what He is in truth. The consequence is, that every lie which they speak of God is in a certain sense a sort of idolatry.
Notes
- 2250
By the instrumenta doctrinæ he here means the writings of the New Testament.
- 2251
[Our author insists on the precise agreement of Catholic Tradition with Holy Scripture. See valuable remarks on Schleiermacher, in Kaye, pp. 279-284.]
- 2252
We add the original of this sentence, which is obscured by its terseness: "Quid de proprio intulimus, ut aliquid contrarium ei et in Scripturis deprehensum detractione vel adjectione vel transmutatione remediaremus?"
- 2253
That is, teaching the same faith and conversation (De la Cerda).
- 2254
Domestica.
- 2255
Integro instrumento.
- 2256
Callidiore ingenio.
- 2257
That is, cutting out whatever did not fall in with it (Dodgson).
- 2258
Non comparentium rerum. [Note, he says above "of them, the Scriptures, we, Catholics, have our being." Præscription does not undervalue Scripture as the food and life of the Church, but supplies a short and decisive method with innovaters.]
- 2259
See , and .
- 2260
Instruendis.
- 2261
Oehler reads "ex Vergilio," although the Codex Agobard. as "ex Virgilio."
- 2262
Denique. ["Getica lyra."]
- 2263
Otis.
- 2264
Nec periclitor dicere. [Truly, a Tertullianic paradox; but compare . N.B. Scripture the test of heresy.]
- 2265
.
- 2266
"Interpretur" is here a passive verb.
- 2267
Res.
- 2268
Sacramentorum divinorum. The form, however, of this phrase seems to point not only to the specific sacraments of the gospel, but to the general mysteries of our religion.
- 2269
Compare Tertullian's treatises, de Bapt. v. and de Corona, last chapter.
- 2270
Expositionem.
- 2271
"Et sub gladio redimit coronam" is the text of this obscure sentence, which seems to allude to a pretended martyrdom. Compare Tertullian's tract, de Corona, last chapter.
- 2272
The Flamen Dialis. See Tertullian's tract, ad Uxorem, i. 7.
- 2273
[Corruptio optimi pessima. Compare the surprising parallels of M. Huc between debased Christianity and the paganism of Thibet, etc. Souvenirs d'un voyage, etc. Hazlitt's translation, 1867.]
- 2274
Morositatem Illam. [He refers to the minute and vexatious ordinances complained of by St. Peter (,) which Latin Christianity has ten-folded, in his name.]
- 2275
Gestiit.
- 2276
Attemperare.
- 2277
i.e., the Scriptures of the New Testament.